Contoh Instrumen Soal Hasil Belajar

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arends, R. I. (2013). Learning to teach (9th ed.). Copyright © by McGraw-Hill Education.

Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Peluasan instrumen pengukur higher titipan thinking skills ilmu hitung siswa SMA papan bawah X. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu hitung, 12(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14058

Bayuni, K. H., Candiasa, I. M., & Koyan, I. W. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Matematika dengan Teknik Part-Whole pada Siswa SD Inferior IV Se-Kecamatan Gianyar. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Perkumpulan Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(2), 1–21.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.

Candiasa, I. M. (2010). Pengujian instrumen penelitian disertai aplikasi Iteman dan Bigsteps. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.

Darminto, B. P. (2013). Improving the Ability of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains Perian, 1(2), 101–107.

Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2012). Revisi taksonomi Bloom sepi kognitif: rang landasan bikin pembelajaran, pengajaran , dan asesmen. Premiere Educandum: Koran Pendidikan Asal Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 98–117.

Hanifah, Ufuk. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) di sekolah dasar. Conference Series, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/crecs/article/view/14286

Johar, R. (2012). Domain Pertanyaan PISA bagi Literasi Ilmu hitung. Koran Prospek, 1(1), 30–41.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Higher Kiriman Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktort Jenderal Pendidikan Asal dan Sedang Departeman Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Mahirah, B. (2017). Evaluasi membiasakan petatar ajar (siswa). Harian Idaarah, I(2), 257–267.

Mardapi, D., Kunaidi, & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala sahih. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341.

Ndiung, S., Dantes, Kaki langit., Ardana, I. M., & Marhaeni, A. (2019). Treffinger Creative Learning Eksemplar with RME Principles on Creative Thinking Skill by Considering Numerical Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12344a

Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach : Its application and development through the use of a Table of spesifications methodoly. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813476922

OECD. (2013). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. German: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2022 insights and interpretations. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2022 Insights and Interpretations final PDF.pdf

Pandra, V., & Mardapi, D. (2017). Development of Mathematics Achievement Test for Third Grade Students at Elementary School in Indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(8), 769–776.

Partnership for 21st Century learning. (2011). P21 Framework Definition. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

Retnawati, H. (2017). Validitas dan reliabilitas konstruk skor konfirmasi kemampuan calon mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(2), 126–135.

Sari, E. F. P. (2015). Peluasan cak bertanya matematika ideal PISA untuk mengetahui argumentasi siswa di sekolah semenjana purwa. 124–147. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id

Setianingsih, R., Sa’dijah, C., & Rahman, A. (2017). Investigating Fifth- Grade Students ’ Construction of Mathematical Knowledge through Classroom Discussion. International Electronic Journal of Matematics Education, 12(3), 383–396.

Simalango, M. M., Darmawijoyo, & Aisyah, N. (2018). Kajian kesulitan pelajar dalam menyelesaikan soal-pertanyaan PISA taun 2022 level 4, 5, dan 6 di SMPN 1 Indralaya. Kronik Pendidikan Ilmu hitung, 12(1), 43–58.

Sudaryono. (2011). Implementasi Teori Responsi Butir ( Item Response Theory ) pada Penilaian Hasil Belajar Penutup di Sekolah. Kronik Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(6), 719–732.

Tryanasari, D., Aprilia, S., & Cahya, W. A. (2017). Pembelajaran literasi di SDN Rejosari 1 kecamatan Kawedan kabupaten Magetan. Premiere Educandum: Buku harian Pendidikan Asal Dan Pendedahan, 7(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v7i2.1641

Van De Walle, J. A. (2013). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Development (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Yani, A., Asri, A. F., & Burhan, A. (2013). Kajian tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan fungsi distraktor pertanyaan ujian semester ganjil. E-Journal Institut Sriwijaya, 98–115.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan kredibilitas gawai peelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Kronik Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23.

Yuwono, A. (2016). Problem solving dalam pembelajaran ilmu hitung. Union: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 6–7.

Source: http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/PE/article/view/6274